Resource Center › Compliance
Stark Law
MedPro Systems and SAP® Concur® collaborate to help businesses capture and monitor expenses made to Healthcare Professionals (HCPs).
U.S. Federal, CMS
Physicians and designated health services (DHS) entities
$535 per physician for 2026
DOJ, CMS and HHS OIG
What Is Stark Law?
First enacted by Congress in 1989, Section 1877 of the Social Security Act (referred to as the “Physician Self-Referral Law” or, more commonly, “Stark Law”) was implemented to protect Medicare and other beneficiaries from costs associated with physician referrals for clinical laboratory services with which they had a direct financial relationship. As part of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1993, Stark Law was further expanded (Section 1903) to prohibit all referrals to Designated Health Services (DHS) payable by Medicare with which the physician (or an immediate family member) has a financial relationship, unless an exception applies.
Since then, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has published a number of rules and regulations interpreting the Stark Law statute, defining covered DHS entities and penalties for non-compliance.
The Importance of Complying with Stark Law
Federal fraud and abuse laws include the Physician Self-Referral Law [42 U.S.C. § 1395nn], commonly referred to as the Stark law, which prohibits physicians from referring patients to receive “designated health services” payable by Medicare or Medicaid from entities with which the physician or an immediate family member has a financial relationship, unless an exception applies.
The federal entities overseeing the enforcement of Stark Law include: the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services(CMS) and the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS OIG). At its core, it is designed to eliminate any potential conflict of interest that could cloud medical judgment. By ensuring that healthcare decisions are solely guided by patients’ best interests, devoid of any financial incentives for physicians, it upholds the ethical standards and transparency crucial to healthcare services.
Under the Stark Law, any HCP, healthcare system or hospital covered by the statute faces strict liability for violations. They can be found at fault for breaches, irrespective of intent or awareness. In other words, merely demonstrating an improper referral suffices to establish liability, regardless of whether the HCP was aware of potential financial or familial conflicts.
A Stark Law violation may require the HCP to refund all payments collected for improper referrals and face exclusion from all federal healthcare programs. Civil monetary penalties reach up to $31,670 for each claim submitted in violation of the law, plus an assessment of up to three times the amount claimed, and up to $211,146 for each circumvention scheme.
Designated Health Services Covered Under Stark Law
What Healthcare Organizations Need to Know
There is an exception in Stark Law which allows DHS entities to provide non-monetary compensation to Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) up to an aggregate amount each year (adjusted annually for inflation).
For calendar year 2026, if the aggregate amount goes above $535, the DHS provider will face penalties for violating Stark Law including but not limited to civil penalties per violation, exclusion from Medicare and a denial of refund from Medicare.
| 2026 Limit | Amount |
|---|---|
| Non-monetary compensation to a physician | $535 per year |
| Medical staff incidental benefits | Less than $46 per occurrence |
| Limited remuneration to a physician | $6,237 per year |
CMS adjusts these limits each calendar year. See the CMS CPI-U updates page.
It is up to the DHS provider to track and record non-monetary compensation expenses and any errors or overages are expected to be reported to CMS using the Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol. To learn more about Stark Law regulations, visit the CMS physician self-referral page.
How MedPro Systems Can Help
The MedPro Concur Connect suite offers DHS entities a comprehensive approach for monitoring non-monetary compensation to HCPs to streamline Stark Law compliance.
MedPro Concur Connect Expense
Enables Sales Representatives to access MedPro data directly within Concur Expense to capture key HCP identifiers in real time, empowering accurate matching and reporting.
MedPro Concur Connect Export
Expense data is exported to MedPro via automated Concur Attendee Detail Extract (ADE) files, securely delivered through MedPro-hosted FTP.
MedPro Data Matching, Tracking and Report Creation
After Export, MedPro automatically loads the ADE files and matches HCPs against the MedProID® database to aggregate spend. Stark customers will be given access to MedPro Compliance Reporting ID® to view our Stark Law Analytics report. This report will track unique physicians and the current aggregate spend against them across your organization.
MedPro’s reports and dashboards enable you to stay ahead of potential overages and compliant with Stark law, avoiding fines or penalties. Find activity trends with HCPs and your own sales representatives to accurately and efficiently manage expenditures and reporting.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Streamline Compliance?
Book a demo to see the difference holistic, scalable, integrated transparency coverage enhanced by trusted data and a responsive, proactive team of industry veterans can make.
Related resources
-
Provider Verification Beyond Compounding Pharmacy Onboarding
How current provider and facility information supports documented decisions from account setup through order fulfillment.
-
Where Prescriber Verification Fits in the Specialty Pharmacy Workflow
A practical look at verification checkpoints from prescription intake through dispensing and the value of current provider data at each stage.
-
7 Workflow Gaps That Slow Down Life Sciences Compliance Teams
As compliance responsibilities grow, small gaps between data, systems and teams can create extra manual work. Here are 7 places to look first and practical steps your team can take to strengthen the workflow.
-
Two International Disclosure Dates to Plan For
Colombia’s biannual value-transfer filing is due September 30, and Japan’s annual disclosure window follows each company’s fiscal year end.



